ON OUR MISFORTUNE

How Russia can become the world champion of wisdom

 ACADEMY OF DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT – INSTITUTE OF SKY POLITICS

At humanity's transition from an industrial to an information society, the main content of the Third World War of a new hybrid type is the war of meanings. At the core of the war of meanings lies the image of the future, either as linear progress in the struggle of opposites, or as cycles of change in the linkages of three forces.

Politics in a binary picture of the world is characterized by the principle: whoever is not with us is against us, and the third is superfluous—there is no third option.

Politics in a ternary picture of the world is characterized by a different principle: we ourselves, our enemies, and our allies.

The game model of politics in the binary picture of the world is the Great Chessboard: "White" moves first and wins.

In the ternary one – the Card Table of History: The first move is gold. 

The stratagem of real politics is the substitution of the game. Then suddenly: not won, but lost, and not at chess, but at cards.

In practical politics, the masters of substituting the game, in the transition from binary chess schemes to ternary ones, were London and Beijing (the luminaries of the card game of bridge: Churchill, Thatcher, Deng Xiaoping).

In ternary schemes, the Law of Change operates in the linkages of three forces:

1. If two forces are active and the third is passive, the linkage of forces turns in favor of the passive force. (1+1) +0=0
2. If two forces are passive and the third is active, the linkage of forces turns in favor of the active force. (0+0) +1=1

The success of applying the first variant in 1969 was demonstrated by Mao Zedong:

By instigating an armed border conflict around Damansky Island on the Ussuri River and at Lake Zhalanashkol in Kazakhstan, Mao broke the USSR-PRC tandem and made China the third passive force in the triangle where the two superpowers—American imperialism and Soviet social-imperialism—clashed in the Cold War. 

Having become the third force, China extracted technology, penetrated markets, and played its partners' political cards to its own advantage. The parable played out: the Cunning Monkey from the mountain watches the clash of two tigers in the valley. The USSR lost the Cold War. The skin of the Soviet tiger went to China in the form of the SCO.

From the UN rostrum, Deng Xiaoping called Chairman Mao Zedong's Theory of dividing the world into three parts the greatest contribution to the treasury of Marxism-Leninism (in Marxism there is dialectics).

To understand the processes in the triangle PRC – USA – RF, let us reduce the entire complex diversity of shades of politics to three basic colors: red, blue, and black. Red is the color of communism. Blue is of liberalism. Black is of radical nationalism.

It is important to understand which political forces, and with what conceptual foundation, are now entering the black international that has raised the banner of revenge over blue liberalism – which defeated the black Nazis of Germany, the fascists of Italy and the militarists of Japan in WWII.

Having passed over, within the black international, the black aristocracy, the black sun of the Jesuits, the jihad of Islam and the Black-Hundred patriots of the RF, let us place in the focus of attention the religious nationalism of Hasidic Jews, for it is precisely these fellows in black hats who now run things behind the scenes.

Here it must be emphasized that the chimera of a multipolar world is not applicable to war. War is always a clash of two sides (coalitions). But in the shadows there is also a third, standing above the fray.

In WWIII of a new hybrid type, two coalitions of the new era are fighting for the place of world leader: the Global North, led by the USA (the blacks), and the Global South, led by China (the reds). 

The third beneficiary above the fray is the master of money matters standing behind the scenes of international relations – the executors of the three-thousand-year Solomon Plan – acting according to the Covenant of the Most High as interpreted by the kabbalah – the algebra of thought of the conceptual East (“Babylonian charomutie”).

Under President Trump, the USA went from leader of the blues to black: “Make America Great Again.” The leader of blue liberalism, uniting the West, has now again become France with the historic motto of the great revolution: “Liberty – Equality – Fraternity.”

The New Russia of democratic choice, as a result of the conflict with Ukraine cut off from the West by sanctions, having lost the liberal values of the all-European home, having taken the position of conservative traditionalism and having lost its “momentum,” has found itself at a crossroads:

• either to join the black international and follow Trump’s Hasidic-Chabad coalition,
• or to enter Xi Jinping’s red coalition and move toward the Community of Shared Future for Mankind, 
• or to dare to pursue its own project, Greater Eurasia – the Third Horde.

In the current alignment of the Great Game at the card table of history, Trump has set the task of tearing apart the strategic interaction of the RF and the PRC, of pulling Russia out of the coalition of the South (BRICS) into the coalition of the North and, thereby, depriving the PRC of its strategic rear.

The creator of Kremlin meanings, V. Surkov, in 2023 came out with a manifesto, “The Birth of the North,” in which he substantiated the prospect of uniting Rus’, as a country of the North, with the North American United States and the Northern Europe of the Teutons (Aryans).

Hence also the meeting of the presidents of the RF and the USA on 15.08.25 in Alaska, with the themes of good-neighborliness and cooperation in the Arctic brought into the light.

However, the USA and the RF are in a position of active confrontation, whereas the PRC occupies the passive position of judge above the fray. Now, in order for Russia, in the triad of forces, to end up the historic winner, it needs to go into the passive, freeing the front of active struggle for the place of “first-order world power” to China.

In the spring of 2025, China’s top diplomat Wang Yi openly stated that China cannot allow Russia to lose in the conflict with Ukraine, for otherwise the entire West would fall upon the PRC.

Probably Putin has indeed decided on a substitution of the game, replacing chess with a card layout in the triad of forces, and is thinking about how to go into the passive. 

It is quite obvious that for such a historic maneuver Russia needs to wind down the SMO, remove the belligerent rhetoric toward NATO, stop rattling nuclear weapons, concentrate on the tasks of the “coming century,” and with all its heart and all its thoughts occupy itself not with geopolitical abstraction but return to its own fold, to the civilizational project Greater Eurasia – the Third Horde.

The trouble with the New Russia is that there is no developed project for seizing the future as such. The elite retains its servility before the West, is mired in corruption and infighting, while the people remain silent. The hope that the fighting in Ukraine would lead to the spontaneous combustion of the Russian spirit proved vain.

But hope dies last. Sky Politics has not lost its historical optimism and, with the wisdom of Lenin’s “obscene Brest Peace” by which Russia exited WWI, now speaks of a salvific withdrawal from the front of WWIII of the new hybrid type so that, having staked on the paradox of Russian thought (unpredictable stupidity), to overtake competitors without catching up.

In 2012 our book “Anti-Kipling” was published, with an interpretation of the Masonic view of the history of the future in “The Jungle Book.” Continuing the Masonic line in world history, Sky Politics assures those who seek the truth that in the process of the transformation of “this age,” Russian thought will be the first to cast off the shackles of the old world order and soar to the Spirit of Truth.

the wisdom of Rus’ will become the head of the new world order

Watch the video clip “About Our Trouble” https://youtu.be/5XLYmlIfg5o

Executed by Andrey Devyatov  N 1044 of 18.08.25